Who’s Behind NC’s Extreme Abortion Ban?

By Saige Smith

NC House Bill 533 – A Total Abortion Ban

On March 26, North Carolina Republicans filed the first anti-abortion legislation of the session, and it’s bad. This bill would ban abortion from conception, with narrow “exceptions” to save the life of the pregnant person, but lacks exceptions for rape, incest, and health of the pregnant person. In an attempt to appear more palatable to conservative Democrats needed to override the Governor’s veto and the public, the legislation has a very narrow exception to save the life of the pregnant person. However, we have seen that similar “exceptions” in other states with similar bans have proved to be insufficient for people in need of an abortion. The bill text also made sure to include that this exception “does not include any situation where the risk of death or substantial impairment of a major bodily function arose from a claim or diagnosis that the female would engage in conduct that may result in the female’s death or in substantial impairment of a major bodily function.” What this text does is prohibit an abortion when a claim or diagnosis is made that the pregnant person may act in a way that could cause major injury or death. This is important to note as it shows us that these anti-abortion politicians do not care about the actual life of the pregnant person.

Republicans have taken the mask off by imposing harsh criminal and civil penalties for people who provide abortions. If enacted, HB 533 would make performing, inducing, or attempting an abortion resulting in the death of an “unborn child” a Class B1 felony, which is punishable by up to life in prison. It would make abortion providers subject to civil penalties of “no less than $100,000 for each violation” and the revocation of their medical licenses. Despite the bill including text that prohibits the prosecution of pregnant people seeking to obtain an abortion, we have seen overzealous anti-abortion police and prosecutors find a way to target people who seek out abortion care, even when there are no authorizing statutes. This bill would disproportionately harm poor people, rural people, and especially Black and Brown people, as does any restriction to abortion access. North Carolina currently has 14 clinics, however 91% of counties in the state do not have a clinic.

The Language of the Bill

One notable thing about the bill text is that it attempts to redefine abortion as “the intentional killing of an unborn child”. An “unborn child” is defined from “fertilization to birth”. This language is one of the latest multi-state trends directly in line with a few anti-abortion beliefs: 1) life begins at conception/fertilization, 2) that abortion is not the treatment for ectopic pregnancy, and 3) the “removal of a dead, unborn child” is not an abortion —the treatment for stillbirth or miscarriage, which from a medical standpoint is a spontaneous abortion — because it has to have intent (according to anti-abortion conservatives). None of these beliefs are medically accurate nor are they backed up by medical consensus. This distinction would mean that the law wouldn’t allow miscarriage treatment for pregnant people whose fetuses still have a heartbeat. Denial of care due to the presence of a fetal heartbeat is a huge health risk for pregnant people who have gotten dangerous infections or gone septic — a traumatic and preventable situation that has become increasingly common in anti-abortion states. As one healthcare provider stated, “we should be able to prevent medical emergencies, not just treat them.”

Despite the bill claiming to not apply to contraceptives, the language of the bill does not clarify which forms of birth control they’re talking about. This is important to note because many conservatives believe that IUDs, Plan B, and other forms of emergency contraception prevent the implantation of a fertilized egg and are therefore abortifacients. The wording of this could eventually lead to these contraceptives to becoming illegal.

Even such an extreme ban as this one will not be the end. South Carolina has shown how anti-abortion extremists will not stop, even at complete abortion bans. They are more than willing to arrest people for accessing basic healthcare and give people the death penalty for providing lifesaving measures. The mask is off — politicians realize they can do just about anything, even state-sanctioned murder, if they say that it’s all done to “protect life” or “protect children.” The denial of bodily autonomy and the erosion of our rights is the goal of these anti-abortion politicians.

Who’s Behind the Legislation?

The anti-abortion movement has deep ties to ultra-conservative organizations with increasing political influence that has allowed them to push the implementation of an array of discriminatory policies targeting marginalized communities, as well as eroding all citizens’ basic human rights.

Two of the major anti-abortion policy groups are the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) and the Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America (SBA), formerly known as Susan B Anthony List. The National Right to Life Committee is “the oldest and largest pro-life organization in America” and has a history of campaigning for far right-wing politicians and getting them into elected office, then pressuring them to enact anti-abortion legislation. The NRLC created terms that are commonly used in the anti-abortion movement’s jargon, such as “partial-birth abortion” and “abortion trafficking”, and they helped popularize Todd Akins’ “legitimate rape” theory, showing how these politicians really feel about women and pregnant people. The NRLC’s position on abortion is as extreme as they come: pushing for legislation with no exceptions for rape, incest, or the health of the pregnant person, insufficient “exceptions” for the life of the pregnant person and harsh criminal and civil punishments for those who help provide abortion care.

On July 4, 2022, just over a week after Roe v Wade was overturned, the National Right to Life Committee released a memo proposing how to model abortion bans and the enforcement of them. It includes model legislation on banning abortion in all cases except to prevent the death of the mother, how to target people who “aid and abet” abortion, restricting access to abortion medication, “abortion trafficking” (which we are now seeing pop up in legislation), the redefining of abortion, enforcement of these measures through reporting requirements by physicians, the attorney general and private citizens with harsh penalties such as excessive fines, lengthy prison sentences, license and certification revocation, and more.

One of the HB 533 sponsors, Representative Keith Kidwell, has ties to one of the far-right militia groups that was a part of Jan 6th insurrection, the Oath Keepers. All of this goes to show how deeply the religious right and the broader ultra-conservative movement are connected.

What Can We Do?

For HB 533 to become law, it would need to have a hearing on the House floor, then it would be referred to relative committees and debated and agreed upon before passing in the NC House. It would then go through this process again in the Senate before ultimately landing on Gov. Roy Cooper’s desk. Governor Cooper has been a staunch supporter of abortion rights in North Carolina and will very likely veto it. When that happens, the Republican-held legislative branch will likely move to override Governor Cooper’s veto.

After the last midterm elections, the Senate won a Republican super-majority and the House fell one seat shy. This essentially means that Republicans only need one conservative Democrat to side with them to override the Governor’s veto — and they have a few. Due to the changing of some House rules regarding veto overrides and the near Republican super-majority, it’s vital that we contact our representatives and let them know to vote against this bad bill and be present for all votes.

Political strategists think this bill may be a test to see where support in the legislative branch is from Republican representatives. Currently, we are in a long session and things could change at any time. The Speaker of the House, Tim Moore, says it won’t change — but we should never take a politician’s word for it. It’s likely that a 12-week abortion ban could be proposed before the filing deadline, which is April 18th in the NC House or the crossover deadline for both chambers on May 7th. If a 12-week ban is introduced, it would have more support in both chambers to be able to pass a veto override. [Ed. note: as of publication, this legislation has passed both the House and Senate].

Any ban on abortion is a direct attack on our bodily autonomy and basic human rights and should be taken seriously. These bans are not based in science and what reproductive healthcare experts have to say on the matter. Instead, they are rooted in misogyny, white supremacy, and paternalism which disproportionately harm all marginalized communities. Even though Roe was the floor and not the ceiling, we are only nine months in a post-Roe America and have already seen the devastating effects directly caused by bans on abortion.

You can take action online at craftivism.art.blog to email your legislators, the Governor, and Attorney General, including three Democrat representatives’ contact info and a script to urge them to vote against this harmful bill.

Source: craftivism.art.blog, April 3, 2023